Flumazenil vs. placebo in hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Randomized controlled trials testing flumazenil in hepatic encephalopathy have shown conflicting results. AIM To compare flumazenil and placebo in hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS An overview of randomized controlled trials comparing flumazenil and placebo in hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis was performed. For each end-point, heterogeneity and treatment efficacy were assessed by Peto and Der Simonian methods. As most trials were crossover in nature, a sensitivity analysis was performed including the two treatment periods. RESULTS Six double-blind randomized controlled trials, including 641 patients (326 treated with flumazenil and 315 with placebo), were identified. The treatment duration ranged from 5 min to 3 days. Heterogeneity tests between control groups were not significant. The mean percentages of patients with clinical improvement (five trials) were 27% in treated groups and 3% in placebo groups. This difference was significant by both methods (Peto: odds ratio=6.15; 95% confidence interval, 4.0-9.5; P < 0.001; Der Simonian: mean rate difference, 29%; 95% confidence interval, 17-41; P < 0.001). The mean percentages of patients with electroencephalographic improvement were 19% in treated groups and 2% in placebo groups. This difference was significant only with the Peto method (odds ratio=5.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-9.7; P < 0.001). The sensitivity analysis showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis shows that flumazenil induces clinical and electroencephalographic improvement of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis.